600+
Licensed specialists
Consultants and attending physicians in active clinical practice
Review board
Licensed, credentialled specialists reviewing your records
Independence is the point. Reviewers are credentialled, subspecialty-matched, free of any link to your treating team and required to state their reasoning in writing.
Our global panel
A worldwide panel of doctors and specialists covering every major field of medicine
Your records are matched to a consultant who treats your condition every week — in the right specialty, the right subspecialty and, wherever possible, the right healthcare system for the decision in front of you.
40+
Countries covered
Reviewers across Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, the Gulf and Africa
70+
Specialties & subspecialties
From medical oncology and interventional cardiology to rare disease genetics
20+
Languages supported
Records accepted in most major languages, reports delivered in English
5 days
Typical turnaround
Standard reviews returned within five working days of complete records
100%
Clinician-signed reports
Every report reviewed, edited and digitally signed by a named specialist
United Kingdom & Ireland
Oncology, cardiology, neurology, gastroenterology, nephrology
Western & Northern Europe
Surgical oncology, haematology, endocrinology, transplant medicine
North America
Precision oncology, cardiac electrophysiology, neurosurgery, immunology
Middle East & Gulf
Internal medicine, paediatrics, orthopaedics, respiratory medicine
Asia-Pacific
Hepatology, stroke medicine, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology
Africa & Indian Ocean
Infectious disease, tuberculosis, maternal health, general medicine
Specialist directory
An international board of licensed, credentialled specialist reviewers
Search the directoryCountryLanguageHospital experienceYears of experienceSpecialtyAvailability
Reviewer identity is protected until matching. Once your case is assigned you receive the named consultant, their specialty, country of practice and registration details before the review begins.
MO
Consultant Medical Oncologist
Medical Oncology · Breast & lung
Northern Europe · 20+ years in practice
English, Swedish
University teaching hospital practice
IC
Consultant Interventional Cardiologist
Interventional Cardiology
United Kingdom · 15+ years in practice
English, Urdu
Tertiary cardiac centre practice
NS
Consultant Neurologist
Neurology & Stroke Medicine
Asia-Pacific · 15+ years in practice
English, Mandarin
Tertiary neuroscience centre practice
GH
Consultant Gastroenterologist
IBD & Hepatology
Germany · 18+ years in practice
English, German
University hospital IBD unit
NP
Consultant Nephrologist
Nephrology & Transplant Medicine
Middle East · 12+ years in practice
English, Arabic
Regional transplant centre practice
HO
Consultant Haematologist
Haemato-Oncology
North America · 16+ years in practice
English, Spanish
Comprehensive cancer centre practice
Your report
A structured, specialist-signed medical review
Every report is drafted by AI from your uploaded records, then reviewed, edited and digitally signed by the relevant specialists before it reaches you.
- Medical summary
- Clinical timeline
- Current diagnosis
- Medication summary
- Risk factors
- Questions for your treating team
- Potential evidence-based options
- Lifestyle guidance (where appropriate)
- Nutrition guidance (where appropriate)
- Monitoring suggestions
- References to recognised clinical guidelines
- Doctor notes & digital signature
Panel transparency
What sits behind the panel numbers: credentials, subspecialties and regions served
Every reviewer counted in our panel figures has cleared the same six checks below, is listed against a declared subspecialty, and practises in a named region. Numbers are updated as reviewers join, revalidate or step down from the panel.
Credentials verified before a reviewer joins the panel
Primary medical qualification
MBBS, MB BCh, MD or equivalent, verified against the awarding institution or the regulator's public record at onboarding.
Specialist certification
CCT, FRCP, FRCS, board certification or the national equivalent in the specialty the reviewer is assigned to.
Current licence to practise
Active registration with a recognised regulator (GMC, IMC, ÄK, ABMS member board, DHA/HAAD, MCI or equivalent), re-checked annually.
Professional indemnity
Cover in force for remote advisory and second-opinion work in the jurisdictions where the reviewer practises.
Active clinical caseload
Reviewers must still see patients in the specialty they review. Retired and non-practising clinicians are not matched to live cases.
Independence declaration
Signed conflict-of-interest statement covering industry relationships and institutional links; anyone connected to your treating hospital is excluded.
Panel composition by specialty group
| Specialty group | Subspecialties covered | Regions served | Panel size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer medicine | Medical oncology, clinical and radiation oncology, surgical oncology, haemato-oncology, neuro-oncology, palliative medicine | UK & Ireland · Western Europe · North America · Gulf · Asia-Pacific | 180+ reviewers |
| Cardiovascular medicine | Interventional cardiology, electrophysiology, heart failure, adult congenital, cardiothoracic and vascular surgery | UK & Ireland · Western Europe · North America · Gulf | 90+ reviewers |
| Neurosciences | Stroke medicine, epileptology, movement disorders, neuromuscular disease, neuro-immunology, neurosurgery | UK & Ireland · Northern Europe · North America · Asia-Pacific | 70+ reviewers |
| Digestive & liver disease | Inflammatory bowel disease, hepatology, pancreaticobiliary medicine, colorectal and upper GI surgery | Western Europe · UK & Ireland · Asia-Pacific | 60+ reviewers |
| Renal, endocrine & metabolic | Nephrology, transplant medicine, diabetology, thyroid and adrenal disorders, obesity medicine | Gulf · UK & Ireland · Europe · Africa | 55+ reviewers |
| Respiratory & infection | Interstitial lung disease, thoracic medicine, sleep medicine, infectious disease, tuberculosis, immunology | Asia-Pacific · Africa · Europe · North America | 50+ reviewers |
| Surgery, musculoskeletal & pain | Orthopaedics, spinal surgery, rheumatology, pain medicine, rehabilitation medicine, plastic and reconstructive surgery | Europe · North America · Gulf | 60+ reviewers |
| Women's, men's & children's health | Gynaecology, reproductive medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, urology, general paediatrics, paediatric oncology and neurology | UK & Ireland · Europe · Gulf · Africa · Asia-Pacific | 45+ reviewers |
What you are told about your own reviewer
Reviewer identities are not published on the site, because panel members continue to work in their own hospitals. Once your case is matched, and before the review begins, you receive the reviewer's full profile so you can verify it yourself on the relevant public medical register.
- Reviewer's full name and specialist title
- Specialty and declared subspecialty interest
- Country of practice and regulator
- Registration or licence number
- Years in specialist practice
- Conflict-of-interest statement for your case
How reviewers are credentialled
Register verification
Every reviewer holds current registration with a recognised medical regulator — for example the GMC in the United Kingdom, the Medical Council in Ireland, or an equivalent national authority — verified at onboarding and re-checked annually.
Active clinical practice
Reviewers must be in current practice in the specialty they review. Retired or non-practising clinicians are not assigned to live cases.
Subspecialty matching
Cases are matched to declared subspecialty interest — for example a thoracic surgical oncologist rather than a general surgeon for a lung resection question.
Conflict of interest declaration
Reviewers declare industry relationships and institutional affiliations. Anyone connected to your treating institution is excluded from your case.
Indemnity
Reviewers must hold professional indemnity covering remote advisory work in the jurisdictions where they practise.
Quality audit
A sample of reports is audited against internal standards for clinical reasoning, guideline citation, plain-language clarity and safety-netting advice.
Reviewer opinions are independent and advisory. A difference between a MedReview 365 opinion and your treating team's plan is not, in itself, evidence that either is wrong; it is a prompt for a fuller conversation with the clinician responsible for your care.