Assignment
You receive cases matched to your registered specialty and declared subspecialty interest. Conflicts of interest are screened automatically against your declared affiliations before assignment.
For clinicians
Review cases with a structured, audited workflow
MedReview 365 handles record collection, chronology building and administration so your time goes into clinical reasoning. You give an independent opinion; you retain full control of every word issued under your signature.
Review workflow
Structured case view
Each case opens as a dated clinical chronology with source documents attached, abnormal results flagged and staging or biomarker data extracted. AI output is presented as a draft for your scrutiny, never as a conclusion.
Independent opinion
You record areas of agreement, areas of difference and residual uncertainty, citing the guideline or evidence you rely on. Guidance is written for a lay reader and a clinical reader simultaneously.
Sign-off
You digitally sign the report. Your name, specialty and registration jurisdiction appear on the issued document, and the signing event is recorded in the case audit trail.
Credentialling requirements
- Current registration with a recognised medical regulator, with a licence to practise
- Active clinical practice in the specialty you wish to review
- Certificate of completion of specialist training or equivalent recognised credential
- Professional indemnity covering remote advisory work in your practising jurisdiction
- Willingness to declare industry and institutional relationships annually
- Agreement to our reporting standards, including plain-language explanation and explicit safety netting
Reporting standards
- State the clinical question and answer it directly
- Distinguish what the records evidence from what they do not
- Name the guideline or trial evidence relied on
- Avoid instructing the patient to start, stop or alter any medicine
- Direct all actionable steps through the patient's treating clinician
- Include safety-netting advice for symptoms requiring urgent assessment
Reviewers provide independent advisory opinions on documentary evidence. Reviewing a case does not create a treating relationship, and reviewers do not prescribe, order investigations or assume responsibility for the patient's ongoing care.